Haven't we heard all this "spread the wealth" nonsense before? Isn't all this stuff being put forth by Obama just the same old tired policies the Democrats have been panhandling for literally decades? Isn't it just the same,albeit slightly more palatable, reworked marxist recipe for economic disaster, cooked up specially for American tastes by the dead-end political left? Why does it qualify for billing as some kind of "hope and change" when it is the same old hype, the same old 60's status quo?
It's like opening a brightly wrapped Christmas present only to discover someone else's fruit cake present passed on to you. It's like all the dead communists and socialists of days gone by rising out of their graves as zombies or vampires, eager to eat the living or suck them dry.

Is it any wonder that Obama stil hasn't answered Joe's simple question, or explained why "spreading the wealth" around is a new, or even hopeful, idea--particularly since we have extensive evidence to the contrary from the last century (remember the collapse of the superpower Soviet Union?) and
already from this one. Poor Joe, he unwittingly unmasked the zombie agenda; and now he must be destroyed.
And, speaking of unwittingly unmasking one of the most critical issues in this campaign (and it is not Sarah Palin's supposed "inexperience").
Think back to Hillary's "3 AM" ad when she stated that Obama was too inexperienced to be President:
No comments:
Post a Comment